Might Apple’s next iPhone actually be the iPhone 6? It will, after all, be the sixth iPhone:
1. iPhone
2. iPhone 3G
3. iPhone 3GS
4. iPhone 4
5. iPhone 4S
6. ????????
The iPhone 4 name made sense, because it was the fourth iPhone. The iPhone 3G made sense because, well, it was 3G.
Perhaps it will be the iPhone 4G, if, as rumoured, it’s a 4G phone. But if Apple go with sequence numbering, rather than a name based on its features, shouldn’t it be the iPhone 6, not the much touted “iPhone 5”?
(PS - I’m sure it won’t be, but thought I’d stake an early claim to some iPhone 6 SEO)
